Yes, of course!
(Now I wonder: how could I NOT see that...)
Thanks, Andrew.
-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Andrew Welch [mailto:andrew(_dot_)j(_dot_)welch(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sendt: 17. november 2006 12:57
Til: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Emne: Re: [xsl] Combine content of separate elements
On 11/17/06, Per Osnes <per(_dot_)osnes(_at_)hia(_dot_)no> wrote:
Hi,
I have a follow-up question to Michael's answer/explanation (below).
Is there any difference between these:
a) select="following-sibling::*[self::para|self::para2][1][self::para2]
b) select="following-sibling::*[self::para2][1]
Or rather:
a) the first following sibling that is a para or para2, provided it is a
para2.
b) the first following sibling that is a para2
I try to see the reason for using the first alternative, but am not able
to...
(a) will only select the next <para2> element if it comes before the
next <para> element, (b) will simply select the next <para2>
It's actually a really impressive way of doing it...
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--