xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XSLT

2006-11-26 22:44:41
Just some points of clarification:
1. Am I correct is saying, what you are talking about is of more use for 
those using XSLT 2.0?

2. As far as sorting is concerned, this saves having a second sort, but 
aside from the performance benefit, there is not much you gain?

Basically, I am trying to understand how useful this is to those of us 
stuck with XSLT 1.x.

On second thought, it looks like XPath1.0 doesn't have a rich set of date 
functions when compared to XPath2.0. 

I haven't tested the use of full date format CCYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS in XSLT1.0 and 
XPath1.0 , it might be more trouble than it's worth if you
are using XSLT 1.0/XPath 1.0 since there are not many date/time functions in 
XPath1.0.

So, you might as well use the original format suggested YYYY-MM-DD


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>