Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation
2007-02-27 09:36:19
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:48:26 -0700, Abel Braaksma <abel(_dot_)online(_at_)xs4all(_dot_)nl>
wrote:
This is only partially so. But instead of this discussion, I tried to
move it upwards a little to show the
pros and cons of either.
I had wanted to get more deeply involved in this discussion earlier, but
time didn't allow. That said, while I agree with most of your PRO/CON
list, there are some techniques that can be combined to bring the best of
both worlds to the equation.
A good portion of you are already aware of this site, but for those who
are not, if you view source after visiting http://browserbasedxml.com/ in
IE, Moz/Fx, and/or Safari** you should be able figure out how you can
minimize the resources on both the client and server using client-side
XSLT to initialize a page with the browser specific JS to ensure the
greatest possible overall performance on a per-browser basis, while at the
same time require the server to do nothing but handle requests for static
files as they relate to each browser, as determined by the browser
itself. See [1,2] for more a more detailed overview.
[1] http://www.xsltblog.com/archives/2005/12/finally_someone_1.html
[2]
http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2006/07/no_sign_of_document_function_b.html
** will break in Opera due to the lack of support for the document()
function, something that both myself, and many others have beaten to death
on both this list and elsewhere, and with what seems to be a promising
future ahead in achieving this functionality, it seems best to just leave
it alone -- for now
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |
http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, (continued)
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Manfred Staudinger
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Robert Koberg
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Robert Koberg
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Robert Koberg
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Andrew Welch
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, David Carlisle
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Manfred Staudinger
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation,
M. David Peterson <=
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Emmanouil Batsis
- RE: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Houghton,Andrew
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Manfred Staudinger
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Manfred Staudinger
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation, Manfred Staudinger
Re: [xsl] XHTML html validation, Braumüller, Hans
|
|
|