Abel Braaksma wrote:
Hi
Florent, that is not the case. Though I often use your
throw-away template because it is so easy and has clear
semantics, the normal precedence rules apply, even if you
use the element() constructor for a match
But a matching template would never looked for that
element, as the default template rule for elements would be
redefined to do nothing, and the root element would match
it.
So the entire tree walk would stop at the... root element:
<xsl:template match="*"/>
<xsl:template match="non-root-element">
Can never be reached.
</xsl:template>
Regards,
--drkm
___________________________________________________________________________
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions !
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur
Yahoo! Questions/Réponses
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--