xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] FizzBuzz in XSLT 1.0. Help with a 2.0/FXSL solution?

2007-03-14 15:34:55
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:46:58 -0600, Abel Braaksma 
<abel(_dot_)online(_at_)xs4all(_dot_)nl> wrote:

True. It's altogether a much more mature language, that still has its flaws 
(but which language hasn't?) but is ready to hit mainstream.

Agreed.

A while back, there was a post about 99 bottles. About the same happened with 
it, resulting in XSLT 2.0 again proving much more powerful then its 
predecessor.

I remember it well > 
http://blogs.msdn.com/mfussell/archive/2004/05/13/130969.aspx#131159 < ;-) and 
if I am remembering correctly, each of the XSLT 2.0 follow-ups were just as you 
pointed out: An obvious check in the win column for XSLT 2.0 to take center 
stage moving forward.

--
/M:D

M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | 
http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--