On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:46:58 -0600, Abel Braaksma
<abel(_dot_)online(_at_)xs4all(_dot_)nl> wrote:
True. It's altogether a much more mature language, that still has its flaws
(but which language hasn't?) but is ready to hit mainstream.
Agreed.
A while back, there was a post about 99 bottles. About the same happened with
it, resulting in XSLT 2.0 again proving much more powerful then its
predecessor.
I remember it well >
http://blogs.msdn.com/mfussell/archive/2004/05/13/130969.aspx#131159 < ;-) and
if I am remembering correctly, each of the XSLT 2.0 follow-ups were just as you
pointed out: An obvious check in the win column for XSLT 2.0 to take center
stage moving forward.
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |
http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--