Any ideas of what I may be doing wrong?
using the (unoffical) jar: URI schem with saxon 8,.8,
probably! The saxon 8.9 release notes say:
Correct. In 8.9 I made a very rare exception to my usual policy of 100%
strict standards conformance by introducing the ability to resolve jar: URLs
despite the fact that this is technically a non-conformance with section 5.8
of the XSLT 2.0 spec, which requires relative URIs in xsl:include and
xsl:import to be resolved as described in RFC 3986.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--