Mark,
If I remember your data and problem right, yes. (More or less. I'm
suspicious of that for-each select: it makes assumptions about its
context. But this is more or less pseudo-code isn't it.)
Cheers,
Wendell
At 11:54 PM 3/31/2007, you wrote:
So all I have to do is this?:
<xsl:for-each select="step[not(step)]">
<ol>
<xsl:for-each select="ancestor-or-self::step">
<li>...</li>
</xsl:for-each>
</ol>
</xsl:for-each>
======================================================================
Wendell Piez
mailto:wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--