On Sun, 27 May 2007 17:07:32 -0600, David Carlisle <davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>
wrote:
I wouldn't expect to see it used much at all in xslt2 for
example.
yeah, there is definitely no need in XSLT 2.0. Of course, my response
regarding the cost of the GET request was based on my thought process
being distracted long enough to suggest something as silly as including
the cost of the GET request for a document that already exists inside of
the transformation process. This, of course, would be correct in cases
where you use the document function to access an external document, but
incorrect when you use it for introspection of the transformation file.
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |
http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--