On 5/29/07, Julian Reschke <julian(_dot_)reschke(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de> wrote:
Sufficient yes, but still a pain. The problem is that you can't do
something like:
<xsl:variable name="foo">
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="function-available(...)">
...
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:variable>
It's been a while since I bothered with this, but I think the pattern
goes something like:
<xsl:variable name="foo-rtf">
....
</
and
<xsl:variable name="foo">
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="function-available(...)">
....
I guess its good that people persist with client side XSLT (as one day
it might be worthwhile), but I reckon its just a hangover from the
original intentions of XML.
The sooner you move your transforms server side, the better imho.
cheers
andrew
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--