Thanks for all the answers, I think I'll gonna go with Mr. Kay's
solution cause the defined ordering lists a large number of keys.
-- Jeff
David Carlisle wrote:
Andrew> which can also be written as:
Andrew> <xsl:apply-templates select="(div[2], div[3], div[5], div[1],
div[4])"/>
oh yes if we're using xpath2 there's other ways as well eg
<xsl:apply-templates select="for $p in (2,3,5,1,4) return div[$p]"/>
this is equivalent to Andrew's although actually neither's quite
equivalent to my original suggestion of 5 apply-templates calls,
as in that case position() and last() would be equal to 1 each time
whereas in either of the versions here, last() is 5 and position() would
be 1..5, which is often preferable.
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--