At 09:18 PM 8/27/2007, you wrote:
So if "note[para[2]] " means "at least 2", how do you express "exactly 2"?
If you didn't want "note[count(para)=2]", you could say
note[para[2]][not(para[3])]
These could be expressed a bit more intelligibly in XPath 2:
note[exists(para[2])] -- the note has a second para
note[exists(para[2])][not(exists(para[3]))] -- the note has a second
para, but not a third
But I might opt for note[count(para)=2] as it's both concise, and
quite obvious.
Cheers,
Wendell
======================================================================
Wendell Piez
mailto:wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--