At 2007-12-26 18:17 +0530, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
Incidentally, for the above example, I would write the expression as:
//c[parent::b]
//c[parent::f]
(in these examples, we filter nodes using a predicate).
Have you considered instead the following equivalent addresses:
//b/c
//f/c
or //c (if you want to select all 'c' elements everywhere in the tree).
Remembering, though, in all the above cases that "//" can be an
expensive XPath address and should be used sparingly.
I hope this helps.
. . . . . . . . . . . Ken
--
Comprehensive in-depth XSLT2/XSL-FO1.1 classes: Austin TX,Jan-2008
World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training
RSS feeds: publicly-available developer resources and training
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--