Why yes, you're absolutely right. I'll rephrase and simply say:
"XSLT 1.0 is something I have to live with [at the moment [because we're
about to ship [and it's not just a recompile]]]".
Here's a newbie question: what other free XSLT 2.0 processor is there out
there (and available as source code) ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Colin Adams [mailto:colinpauladams(_at_)googlemail(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:05 PM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Easy question, big headache.
On 11/03/2008, Patrick Bergeron <pbergeron(_at_)innobec(_dot_)com> wrote:
And yes, XSLT 1.0 is a constraint I need to live with, too bad.
It didn't sound like it to me. As far as I could tell, your only
limitation was that you didn't want to bother with compiling an XSLT
processor on your embedded system.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--