Michael Kay schrieb:
The other day, "sibling recursion" was mentioned on this list.
Does the following qualify as sibling recursion - and is this
likely to be more efficient for large input?
<xsl:apply-templates mode="toc"
select="(following-sibling::h1 |
following-sibling::h2)[ 1 ]"/>
Might be safer to do following-sibling::*[self::h1 or self::h2][1] -
but depends on the processor.
Why might this be safer? Aren't the resulting node-sets the same and
the expressions therefore equivalent? Doesn't the union operator impose
document order?
Michael Ludwig
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--