I agree. Although I'm pretty much wedded to Saxon-B I just hate to
rely on what I'd consider to be a "beneficial side-effect" of Saxon
processing...
On Apr 16, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Colin Adams wrote:
On 16/04/2008, Chris von See <chris(_at_)techadapt(_dot_)com> wrote:
Using generate-id() also works for points 1 and 3 above, and
(using Saxon-B
9.0.0.4) it *appears* to generate ascending IDs, but I don't know
if I can
depend on this as an ordering mechanism.
You certainly cant rely on such behaviour to be portable across
processors, as the spec. doesn t mandate it.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--