On Fri, 16 May 2008 09:19:53 -0600, Dimitre Novatchev
<dnovatchev(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
The JSON grammar in RFC 4627 is much more loose and describes a JSON
object that does not correspond to an XML document and even not to
what the value of an XSLT 2.0 variable may be (secuence of items of
any type), because for example it allows a named object to have an
array of unnamed scalar (let's say integer) children.
Thanks for this explanation, Dimitre! This seems like the kind of info that
will be interesting to a lot of folks, so I've spread the word a bit >
http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2008/05/dimitre_novatchevxsllist_under.html
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC
Email: m(_dot_)david(_at_)xmlhacker(_dot_)com | m(_dot_)david(_at_)amp(_dot_)fm
| Mobile: (206) 999-0588
Web: http://amp.fm/ | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--