Efficiency and speed depend entirely on the processor you are using: as
always, the rule is to try some experiments that are representative of your
particular situation.
I would have thought collection() was more convenient here, but doc() more
portable.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Madunic [mailto:hajduk(_at_)imag(_dot_)net]
Sent: 26 June 2008 14:52
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: [xsl] which is more effiecient and fast doc() or collection()
Working on converting an XSD to SVG (will hopefully look like
TURBOXML's lovely view). I'm mainly using doc() with a regex
to parse the various directories of XSD files. Since the XSD
is built modularly and each element in its own file (I
personally do not like reading XSDs or XSLTs (for that
matter) in one large file and have to scroll up and down to
make sense of it all, but that is another
discussion) meaning there are a lot of files. So before I
test it out and spend time on switching from doc() to
collection() I was hoping for some feedback.
Which is the better method? Which is faster or more efficient?
Marijan (Mario) Madunic
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--