#### LibXSLT (1.1.22) to the rescue!
$ xsltproc ascii.xsl ascii-soll-es-werden.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?> <Urmel>
<Vorspeise>Süßkirschen mit
Käsesoße</Vorspeise>
<Übelkeit/>
</Urmel>
So is LibXSLT preferable in this respect? Or would I be
justified reporting this as a bug?
Since it has produced output that isn't well-formed XML, yes, you can report
it as a bug.
(By the way, do any of the SGML historians on the list know why character
references are not allowed in element and attribute names? I expect the
reason is just the usual one that committees are far more stupid than their
individual members.)
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--