xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] Grouping problem. 2.0

2008-07-04 09:56:12
David Carlisle wrote:
grr your test document had two L2.1 sections which caused me some grief
trying to work out why it numbered the second one 2.2;-)

If I understand what you want, something like this:



$ saxon9 dpbook.xml dpbook.xsl
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<block role="1" number="1">
   <title role="1">L1</title>
   <block role="2" number="1.1">
      <title role="2">L1.1</title>
      <para>This document defines an XML schema for  ....</para>
   </block>
   <block role="2" number="1.2">
      <title role="2">L1.2</title>
      <para>The normative XML Schema for the OpenDoc ....</para>
   </block>
</block>

Neat. No fancy enumerations either David :-)

I didn't want the nesting (it's to move on to docbook
simplesect elements next, which need to be at para level)
but I think that won't matter.

I've got the numbers, and the section titles.

Sorry about the bum test data. My bad.


Thanks.
regards




regards

--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>