On Tue, Jul 22 2008 18:21:36 +0100, kstubs(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com wrote:
...
Hence, the folowing would be
valid and would result in a 5 inch wide table:
<fo:table table-layout="fixed">
You need to add an inline-progression-dimension or width property.
Would this be correct? So far, I have not had luck with table-layout
fixed tables, all of my tables are just 100% width, and the column
widths do not seem to match my fixed width values consistently (maybe
not at all). I have also tried the above by laying down table-column
elements with a width.
If you don't specify a non-auto inline-progression-dimension value, the
initial value of 'auto' means that automatic table layout is happening
anyway [1].
'100%' is a useful value if you're using proportional-column-width(),
but since you know what length you want, you should use that.
Regards,
Tony Graham
Tony(_dot_)Graham(_at_)MenteithConsulting(_dot_)com
Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert
Menteith Consulting Ltd
XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training
Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 http://www.menteithconsulting.com
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
xmlroff XSL Formatter http://xmlroff.org
xslide Emacs mode http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslide
Unicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#fo_table
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--