Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendant-or-self::node()

Andrew Welch wrote:

> Why does // expand to descendant-or-self::node() rather than to
> descendant::x where x is the next item in the path?
  How would you expand //@a then?

  Regards,

--drkm

























      

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--