xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [xsl] EXSLT and XSLT 2.0

2008-10-14 18:17:04
Is it fair to say that except maybe for some of the math 
functions, all extension functions and elements in EXSLT are 
completely irrelevant if you are using XSLT 2.0? EXSLT is 
mostly of the past?

Have I overlooked something useful?

I think the string handling is all redundant. Most of the date and time
handling is redundant, except for date:parse-date() but I don't think that's
widely implemented. Random number generation and thr trigonometric functions
are still very useful. And as David says, there's still no dyn:evaluate().

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/


--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>