But I also have (and need) a template that simply matches "q[(_at_)next and
@prev]", so my processor (Saxon9b) is throwing a warning about an ambiguous
rule match, with ambiguity between "lg/l[position() = 1]/q[(_at_)next and
@prev]"
and "q[(_at_)next and @prev]".
So my question … Can someone please help me out with another way to express
"lg/l[position() = 1]/q[(_at_)next and @prev]" that will resolve the
ambiguity?
Just add priority="10" (or some other number higher than 1) to the
more specific template match
--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--