Vladimir Nesterovsky wrote:
See http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5630
Thanks. Well, I guess there is no point to spend time writing
another submission, with the scope reduced (only make-tuple(),
tuple-sequence() and is-tuple().) The answer would be the same: not
for 2.1, maybe after, as it would introduced a new type and changed
atomization rules...
Unfortunately, as this is the major drawback of XSLT I think.
Closely followed by a try/catch mechanism.
Regards,
--
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--