I would have though it was more intuitive to use replace(), and I would
expect it's also more efficient, but there's no way of knowing without
measuring it.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Koberg [mailto:rob(_at_)koberg(_dot_)com]
Sent: 10 February 2009 16:43
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: [xsl] most efficient escape quotes?
Hi,
With XSL 1.0 and XPath 1.0 I had used recursion to escape quotes.
Using XPath 2.0, is the most efficient 'escape quotes' (\") the
following:
<xsl:sequence select="string-join(tokenize(., '"'), '\"')"/>
Is there a more efficient (fastest, least memory) way?
thanks,
-Rob
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--