G. Ken Holman schrieb:
<xsl:number> should be used for adding text to the result tree and
only used in variables as a last resort.
I think I may have heard that last week ... :-)
Now it would be perfect if the numbering was done as a strict
sequence of consecutive integers, meaning 1,2,3 instead of, say,
1,3,5.
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
version="2.0">
<xsl:attribute name="no"
select="position() (:within this group:) +
(:count of subgroups within previous groups:)
sum( for $g1 in ../preceding-sibling::G1 return
((count($g1/M)-1) idiv $M-per-G2 + 1) )"/>
Perfect! Thanks!
(I made a note to remember using XPath 2.0 comments to make complex
expressions less cryptic.)
Michael Ludwig
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--