I'm using XSL 1.0
any partucular reason for that? for a new project why you don't you use
xslt2. especially as that would make it much easier in this case.
<FAULT-REF FAULTS="PF01 PF02 PF03 PF04 PF05 PF06 PF07 PF08 PF09 PF10
PF11">
in xslt2 that's just
<xsl:for-each select="tokenize(@FAULTS,'\s+)">
<statemanipulation>
<variableref name="{.}"/>
<fault fault-code="{.}" fault-state="ok"/>
</statemanipulation>
</xsl:for-each>
in xslt 1 you may find that your processor has a tokenize extension
function (saxon:tokenize for example) or exslt:tokenize or you could use
the exslt tokenize template which is a recursive template giving
splitting up the attribute which you can use if your system does not
provide an extension function.
http://www.exslt.org/str/functions/tokenize/
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--