On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Michael
Sokolov<sokolov(_at_)ifactory(_dot_)com> wrote:
including the
bizarre conceit that attribute *nodes* are not matched by the 'node()' test
(perhaps some other name would have been more appropriate?).
I am not aware of the discussions, that went amongst the WG members,
when XSLT 1.0/XPath 1.0 was designed.
But I think,
Calling attributes as "nodes" is ok. As attributes are modeled similar
to other kinds of nodes. They have name, value, parent etc.
Attributes can be referred as @* while other kinds of nodes with
node() and so on.
I find this design ok :)
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--