Thanks Mike,
I imagine I can still use this code to improve my matching to tokenized
strings, in order to determine the *best* match, since that would be the
intersection with the most elements.
Thanks all for the help!
Mark
--- On Sat, 7/4/09, Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com> wrote:
From: Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com>
Subject: RE: [xsl] SET-INTERSECTION function/template for sequences
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 12:10 PM
By the way, I would still like
to implement the set operators
for sequences, just as an XSL exercise to get to know
the
sequences better.
You'll find the code here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#union-intersect-except-on-values
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--