Mario Madunic wrote:
Any for-each that is a descendant of a for-each (with no parent for-each) will
lose its context. The context will be the current node, in this case text. Am I
correct in this assumption?
No, the result of the tokenize is a sequence of string values and that
way in the for-each select="tokenize(...)" you have a string value as
the context item and you can't do XPath like ancestor on string items
(or any atomic values), you can only do XPath on nodes.
--
Martin Honnen
http://msmvps.com/blogs/martin_honnen/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--