At 2009-12-16 09:11 -0800, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
To shift to a what I consider a very important, related topic:
It has been many years since I have adopted writing complete programs
as one XPath expressions, something like this:
...
Now this has been facilitated even further by providing "let
expressions" in XPath 2.1. I will never have to need to define a
separate xsl:variable whose value is a sequence -- this was not
possible without having let expressions in XPath.
However, I cannot find adequate debugger support for this style of
programming.
Have you considered simply wrapping sub-expressions with trace()
since trace() simply returns the first argument as its return value?
The whole program above is treated as one single statement
I tell my students this is a safe way to debug their complex
expressions without disturbing the logic of the XPath expression
(except for injecting the syntax)
I hope this helps.
. . . . . . . . . . . Ken
--
UBL and Code List training: Copenhagen, Denmark 2010-02-08/10
XSLT/XQuery/XPath training after http://XMLPrague.cz 2010-03-15/19
XSLT/XQuery/XPath training: San Carlos, California 2010-04-26/30
Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/i/
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video
Video lesson: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg&fmt=18
Video overview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE&fmt=18
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--