Hi Andrew,
Yes, well, my response to Vyacheslav was a tad rhetorical.
So let's rephrase my original quandary yet again.
"Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT for anything else other than Saxon/Java
(notwithstanding .Net autoport)),
does *any other* community really want one?"
Regards
Justin Johansson
Andrew Welch wrote:
I don't think "XRX" literally means just those 3 parts, it means an
XML Server back end, XQuery and XSLT as the application code
generating (X)HTML and/or XForms for the front end, passing around XML
over http (some of the REST crowd get upset about using REST loosely)
The key ingredients are the XML Server and the fact that its end-to-end XML.
2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode(_at_)adam(_dot_)com(_dot_)au>:
An unexpected but nevertheless an interesting answer.
FWIW, From the first sentence of the Wikipedia writeup on XRX:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XRX_(web_application_architecture)
"In software development XRX is a web application architecture based on
XForms, REST and XQuery."
Not a mention of XSLT there so to challenge your response ...
Would it be reasonable to rephrase my question as:
"Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT 2 for XRX), does the XRX community really want
one?"
(Notwithstanding, and with no disrespect to, Saxon of course).
Regards
Justin Johansson
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--