xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [xsl] error when trying to run stylesheets with saxon:transform() extension

2010-03-29 11:22:48
Lynn,

The version of Saxon is relevant here because the shell stylesheet you are using depends on a Saxon extension which may not be available in the version you are running.

Your options are:
1. Use a version of Saxon that supports the extensions (such as 9.1 or 9.2PE/EE), or 2. Use a different pipelining methodology that doesn't depend on Saxon extensions at all.

We can help you with the latter, or perhaps you'd prefer to mail me off-list (since I wrote the stylesheets).

(For example, I know these stylesheet sequences have been run successfully under XProc using the Calabash processor; but I haven't yet done this myself.)

Cheers,
Wendell

At 05:47 PM 3/26/2010, Mike wrote:
Firstly, this is very Saxon-specific, so it would be better asked on the
saxon-help list (reachable via the Saxon project on SourceForge).

Secondly, the comments in the stylesheet say it was tested with Saxon
9.1.0.3. Which version are you running with?


======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            
mailto:wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================


--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>