There are plenty of people on this list willing and able to show you how
to fix your code. But first you need to show them your code. If it's not
doing what you want, that's because you wrote it wrong.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
On 15/06/2010 18:40, tom schmitter wrote:
Hello,
It seems that using the grouping method "group-starting-with" will cause child text nodes
of the element that starts each group to be omitted from the resulting populations. eg,
group-starting-with="subtitle":
<subtitle/>
text
<b>bolded text</b>
more text
<subtitle/>
...
results in a population that looks like:
<subtitle/>
<b>bolded text</b>
I believe this is the expected behavior. If so, does anyone know of a
workaround? ie, a way to somehow preserve the child text?
For example, my first thought was to wrap the child text nodes in<p>s before performing the grouping, but of
course this caused linebreaks to appear between the child text nodes and following inline elements (in the example
above, linebreaks would appear between "text", "bolded text", and "more text").
My ultimate objective is create hierarchy (in the example, for<subtitle> to be
the parent of all nodes between each subtitle). Is there a better way?
Thanks
Tim
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--