On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:42 PM, David Carlisle
<davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
the code posted appeared to use @xml:id in both documents rather than @ref
???
Yes, sorry, I mistyped that.
I can do something like this:
<xsl:template match="name">
<xsl:variable name="uriRef">
<xsl:value-of
select="(ancestor::*[(_at_)xml:id]/@xml:id)[last()]"/>
</xsl:variable>
probably better to write that as
<xsl:variable name="uriRef" select="ancestor::*[(_at_)xml:id][1]/@xml:id"/.
<xsl:variable name="person"
select="document('file:///people.xml')//person[(_at_)xml:id=concat($var,
'')]"/>
in xslt2 you can write that as
<xsl:variable name="person"
select="key('p',$var,document('file:///people.xml'))"/>
where key is defined by
<xsl:key name="p" match="person" use="@xml:id"/>
If you are using xslt1, you need to wrap the whole of this part of the code
in
<sl;for-each select="document('file:///people.xml')">
...
<xsl:variable name="person"
select="key('p',$var)"/>
...
</xsl:for-each>
This was just what I needed, thank you very much. I am using xslt1
for compatibility.
For comparison, the original method (i.e. making separate document()
calls for each value) took about 35 seconds to render in my webapp.
This method takes about 1 second.
Regards,
Andy
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--