At 2010-07-10 20:41 -0700, Dan Vint wrote:
At 07:34 PM 7/10/2010, you wrote:
How about having:
<xsl:variable name="minOccurs" select="(@minOccurs,1)[1]"/>
<xsl:variable name="maxOccurs" select="(@maxOccurs,1)[1]"/>
... and then changing your tests to variables instead of
attributes? You won't need the tests for absence since the
variable assignment has accommodated absence.
I don't recognize what this is doing, I'm assuming it assigns 1 when
not there, but I don't understand the syntax.
In XSLT 2 the expression (x,y)[1] will take the first member of the
sequence of items addressed by "x" and then "y". A sequence does not
contain any empty sets, so if "x" does not address anything then "y"
is the first member of the sequence.
I suppose if there had been a DTD to validate against I could have
checked for the value directly.
No, because the document model cannot be inspected by an XSLT stylesheet.
I hope this helps.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken
--
XSLT/XQuery training: after http://XMLPrague.cz 2011-03-28/04-01
Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/i/
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--