I have posted the bug at
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10299
if you want to track it.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
On 05/08/2010 12:55, Michael Kay wrote:
On 04/08/2010 13:37, Martin Honnen wrote:
I am struggling to understand whether the root node is used as the
boundary node with xsl:number when a from pattern is specified but no
preceding or ancestor node matches that from pattern.
I agree with you - there's a problem here. The results you are getting
from Saxon and other processors don't match the spec.
There seem to be quite a few tests in the W3C test suite, however,
that assume the behaviour you are seeing. So I'm going to raise it as
a specification bug to give the WG the opportunity to decide whether
it wants to change the spec or the tests.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--