Am 06.08.2010 um 11:15 schrieb Andrew Welch:
When returning atomics (such as xs:string) you should use xs:sequence
and not xsl:value-of, as value-of will create a text node that then
gets "atomized" to an atomic.
Thanks for that reminder... xsl:for-each-group and regular expressions are well
settled in my XSLT2 mind-set, but xsl:sequence is more or less ignored.
If you didnt have the xsl:message call you could do:
<xsl:function name="my:filename" as="xs:string">
<xsl:param name="input" as="xs:integer" />
<xsl:sequence select="concat(if ($input = (1,2)) then ('NO1',
'NO2')[$input] else 'NOx', '.html')"/>
</xsl:function>
Yes, if...
I still try to find the best balance between writing some complex, possibly
hard to debug multi-line XPath expressions or a tree of XSLT elements. Haven't
found a general rule for that, and maybe there isn't.
Thanks a lot,
- Michael
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--