At 2010-10-13 23:02 +0200, Olivier Jeulin wrote:
Le 13/10/2010 20:50, Dimitre Novatchev a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Olivier Jeulin
<olivier(_dot_)jeulin(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Le 13/10/2010 19:50, Dimitre Novatchev a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Scott
Trenda<Scott(_dot_)Trenda(_at_)oati(_dot_)net>
wrote:
New XSLT 2.1 feature? :)
Could be something as:
keys(keyname as xs:string) as item()*
and an additional overload:
keys(keyname as xs:string, document as document-node()) as item()*
Yes, it looks fine. But keys are atomized, so shouldn't keys() return
xs:anyType* instead of item()* ?
Did you mean xs:anyAtomicType* ? Yes, this is precise.
According to
http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel/#types-hierarchy
xs:anyType seemed to be the most generic type,
but I'm not an xpath/schema datatype guru ;)
But since the lookup value cannot be a node, I
think Dimitre's xs:anyAtomicType* is more appropriate than xs:anyType.
I hope this helps.
. . . . . . . . . . Ken
--
XSLT/XQuery training: after http://XMLPrague.cz 2011-03-28/04-01
Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/i/
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--