-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dave Pawson writes:
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:15:01 +0000
Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com> wrote:
Does xslt version next have the member() function Mike?
All these node functions, member seems a fairly obvious one?
What would you expect the member() function to do?
Solve Henrys problem? Return true if the item is a member
of the set of nodes.
As David Carlisle pointed out, '=' already supplies that
functionality. If I had a request for v.next, it would be to expose
support for hash arrays. They are sort-of implicit in xsl:key, but
making them explicit would remove the necessity in my case for
constructing a set of elements to hold the keys.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail:
ht(_at_)inf(_dot_)ed(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFNb2BAkjnJixAXWBoRAs0TAJ9LZHaV6evFVI2gf5j2FOa6HOGKkQCfWuKR
nEiPoV/QuPmx81vGwkxOVVI=
=/DSU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--