Wow, dunce hat of the day to me for not even realizing that nested [] are
valid. This opens up some new possibilities. Thanks a lot for all of your
prompt answers!
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Honnen [mailto:Martin(_dot_)Honnen(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de]
Sent: den 15 april 2011 15:54
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Whitelist preceding siblings
Fredrik Bengtsson wrote:
I've tried something like the following with no luck:
<xsl:template match="x"> ...
<xsl:template match="x[preceding-sibling::*][not(self::a or self::b or
self::c)]"> ...
<xsl:template match="x[preceding-sibling::*[not(self::a or self::b or
self::c)]]">
should match any "x" elements having one of the "unwanted" siblings.
--
Martin Honnen
http://msmvps.com/blogs/martin_honnen/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--