"using a URI naming scheme direction" -> "using a URI naming scheme
directly [in the name]"
At 2011-08-07 21:15 -0500, I wrote:
At 2011-08-08 03:25 +0200, Dirk wrote:
why not just access a tag named <media:group> with "media:group"?
To prevent wars between competing factions regarding who "owns" the
prefix "media:".
The namespace redirection associates an arbitrary prefix with a URI
string that *can* be owned. There are already globally-managed URI schemes.
To keep XML compatible with SGML at a time when it was very
important to be compatible with SGML, using a URI naming scheme
direction wasn't possible. The redirection scheme that was decided
is possible to use with minimal impact (reserving the use of the
colon in a name).
Naming things on a global scale isn't straightforward. I think
namespaces are good (though I know many people don't like
them). That some people don't find them "easy" doesn't mean they
are evil. They solve an important problem. Your offhand proposal does not.
No doubt your post will restart the namespace permathread, but I
felt compelled to spell out the naissance of namespaces. It wasn't
frivolous as your post implied.
I hope this helps.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken
--
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting & instructor-led training
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--