xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [xsl] Help parsing a node

2012-04-27 08:47:47
Yes, I thought that was odd too -- would much prefer to have it grab the first 
occurrence, seems more logical.  When/if I sort out the answer, I'll switch it 
to that as part of my fix.  I did look at the for-each but only quickly; I'll 
go back and take a deeper look.

Thanks --

Michele

-----Original Message-----
From: Wendell Piez [mailto:wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 4:39 PM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Help parsing a node


...This means it is the last of its type, while the more conventional thing 
(and what Martin provided) includes each container that is the first of its 
type.

Look in your for-each and see whether that might be affecting things...


--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>