On 27/09/2012 23:09, Florent Georges wrote:
Andrew Welch wrote:
Hi,
I guess if you are stuck with xpath 1.0 it would have to be
substring... (or split on the ., then round() on the first 3 digits
eg the 490)
Thanks Andrew. That's what I thought too, but I wanted to avoid
string functions for that purpose. What I've done in the meantime is
replacing sum(...) by:
round(sum(...) * 100) div 100
that is, "moving the dot right", rounding as an integer, then "moving
the dot left" again.
But can't the "div 100" itself have a rounding error that means you
don't get an exact answer?
In pure XPath 1.0, without format-number(), I suspect string
manipulation is the only reliable way.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--