Kevin Brown wrote:
Question: Can the table + content be in its own page-sequence?
If the answer is yes, I do not see why you could not use ...
...
Or, if preferred without "only" which I forget may also be a 1.1 concept:
...
Sounds interesting but I would need more help. If you have the time,
please modify Ken's solution so it not only works with XSL-FO 1.1 but
also with XSL-FO 1.0.
Cheers
Jesper Tverskov
http://www.xmlplease.com
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--