As David says: there's the "//" difference, and there's the fact that
index-of() has slightly different comparison semantics - "=" throws an
error if you compare a number to a string, index-of() effectively
returns false.
Both are O(n^2), and are therefore poor solutions given that there's a
perfectly good O(n log n) solution, namely
count(Websites/*) = count(distinct-values(Websites/*))
Michael Kay
Saxonica
On 01/11/2012 13:01, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
Hi Folks,
Are there no duplicate websites in this list:
<Websites>
<Website id="Amazon"> http://www.amazon.com </Website>
<Website id="Apple"> http://www.apple.com </Website>
<Website id="Ebay"> http://www.ebay.com </Website>
<Website id="Google"> http://www.google.com </Website>
<Website id="Microsoft"> http://www.microsoft.com </Website>
<Website id="VirginAtlantic"> http://www.virgin-atlantic.com </Website>
</Websites>
Here is an XPath 2.0 expression to answer that question (thanks to Dimitre):
empty(Websites/*[index-of(../*,.)[2]])
Here is an XPath 1.0 expression to answer that question:
not(//Websites/*[. = preceding-sibling::*])
Are there any situations where those two XPath expressions differ in their
answer?
/Roger
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--