One other difference:
xsl:for-each can leverage xsl:sort. xsl:iterate can not.
Faithfully,
Sean B. Durkin
On 30/08/2013 2:22 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
To my way of thinking, streaming means that we start at the top and
sequentially make our way through the document (or break out if desired). Given
that, it seems like when doing streaming Best Practice is to use xsl:iterate
and not use xsl:for-each. Do you agree?
If there are no parameters passed from one iteration of the loop to the next,
and if there is no break-out, then the two constructs are semantically
equivalent and there is no strong reason to prefer one over the other.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--