Almost right but not quite: the document node is also included in the result of
snapshot().
Your example doesn't show it, but attributes and namespaces of ancestors are
also included in snapshot().
Michael Kay
Saxonica
On 10 Nov 2013, at 10:31, Costello, Roger L. <costello(_at_)mitre(_dot_)org>
wrote:
Hi Folks,
I wish to confirm that I correctly understand what nodes are selected using
copy-of(.) versus using snapshot(.)
I created a 4-slide Powerpoint document that graphically depicts the nodes
selected.
Would you take a look and let me know if the slides are correct please?
http://www.xfront.com/copy-of-versus-snapshot.pptx
Thanks!
/Roger
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--