So, for the moment prior to rewriting this part of the xslt, things should work
if for a given errata_section element, if there are more than one
module_impacted elements, the first one should be unique for the file, i.e. one
errata_section element had three module_impacted elements. Their values were
DSS, VIP, VPA. Like the following:
<module_impacted>DSS</module_impacted>
<module_impacted>VIP</module_impacted>
<module_impacted>VPE</module_impacted>
I should probably rearrange these like this:
<module_impacted>VPE</module_impacted>
<module_impacted>DSS</module_impacted>
<module_impacted>VIP</module_impacted>
And maybe this will get the VPE module to be found?
I'll give this a try! Thanks so much!
Russ
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:00:59PM +0000, David Carlisle wrote:
On 28/02/2014 20:44, russurquhart1(_at_)verizon(_dot_)net wrote:
well more exactly it is finding the sets of errata_section elements that
have the same value for their first module_impacted element, and
returning the first errata_section in each group.
module_impacted elements that are not the first child of an
errata_section are not considered for the grouping (although probably
accidentally they are in the sort)
David
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--