On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com>
wrote:
I wouldn't be blaming the programmers for that.
When you step back, it is clear from all the explanations given, that
the thing doesn't do what it says on the tin.
I think what Ihe is arguing for is that you should be able to read a program
without reading its specification and guess correctly what it does.
No.
I am arguing against RTFM as a stock response.
There are times when it is definitely appropriate, but I don't think
this is one of them.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--